My
critique on two Definitions of Blended Learning
Blended learning is a
systematic process of
selecting appropriate learning and teaching strategies, technology and media to achieve learning outcomes set (adapted from
Dick, Carey, & Carey, 2009; Holden & Westfall, 2010)
Strengths
·
This
definition is more generalised, so the party which is going to establish
blended learning can structure the course in their own way
·
Torrisi-Steele
(2011) stresses that in this type of definitions teaching and learning aims are
inherent
Weakness
·
It
is more vague and formless.
·
It
identifies almost any teaching endeavour as blended learning (Torrisi-Steele,
2011)
Blended learning is 'a formal
education program in which a student learns at least in part through
online learning, with some element of student control over time, place, path,
and/or pace; at least in part in a supervised physical environment; and the
modalities along each student’s learning path within a course are connected to
provide an integrated learning experience’ (UNSW Faculty of
Medicine)
Strengths
·
This
definition provides more specific characteristics of blended learning.
·
As
highlighted by Torrisi-Steele (2011), the key ideas/concepts of blended learning
is acquired from this definition (eg: flexibility, integration, variation,
transformation, interaction)
·
Garrison
& Vaughan (2008), advocates the idea of 'integration' rather than
superficial approach, since it allows room for re-examination of existing
approach and subsequent adoption of the new approach
Weakness
·
Too
many words for definition. A simple and meaningful definition is always better
·
According
to Torrisi-Steele (2011), this definitions place emphasis solely on the
presence of both f2f interaction and technology rather than on the potential
pedagogical impact.
My
Definition of blended learning Proposed for VC
Blended learning is a student centred systematic
integration of enriched f2f interaction with best of online technologies.
Why adopt blended learning
Singh (2003)
emphasizes on the benefits of blended learning on the university administrators,
faculties and students.
For
administrators, blended learning…
·
offers
a learner-centered pedagogy
·
may
integrate with the strategic plan
·
improves
classroom utilization
·
can
help match delivery to academic need
·
can
help fill under-enrolled courses and programs.
For
faculty, blended learning….
·
gives
access to new resources
·
introduces
them to online learning
·
is
an opportunity for faculty development and lets them experiment with
new pedagogies and techniques
·
helps
meet student expectations and build student skills
·
allows
for more flexible scheduling
·
retains
the face-to-face aspect faculty may cherish
For
students, blended learning…
·
meets
expectations for utilizing technology
·
develops
independent learning skills
·
offers
increased flexibility and convenience
·
provides
better access to those with job, family, or distance barriers
·
helps
reduce educational costs
From
my experiences of teaching, assessing and/or providing feedback in a blended or
open mode.
At the beginning
it took time and new skills to engage in the online community and to develop course
materials but once the initial preparation and readiness was over it was more
convenient to organize and automate learning activities. In addition, blended
learning provided me to work in more flexible schedules and got access to new
resources and skills. The new teaching approach made me achieve the teaching
objectives more efficiently and effectively. Through blended learning student participation
and engagement was enhanced. I also experienced the efficiency in documenting
online group and individual work and participation for assessment purpose. In
general, I found the change of my role as a traditional teacher to a more student
centered facilitator.
Quadrants
related to Staff Engagement and Method of Delivery
According to the quadrants related to staff engagement and method of
delivery proposed by Marshall (2014), the courses currently offered in VC
mainly stands in the traditional University Courses. However few online distant
course characteristics are found. With shift in the HE paradigm it is expected
that the courses will shift from fully delivered on campus courses to partially
delivered online courses. I do not yet see the trend where all the courses
might be shifted to fully delivered courses.
Use
of SECTIONS tool in Adopting New Technology
SECTIONS tool offered by Bates & Poole (2003) to help in technology
selection seems perfect in choosing
the technology which is appropriate for the courses in VC. Most of the time, main aspects related to adopting technology. This
tool guides us to think critically towards the factors in which the technology
might affect.
Levels
of Engagement Across the Institution
This tool will help institutions
·
To
in cooperate technology into teaching and learning
·
To
encourage its staffs to be up to date with the varieties and the use of latest enhancement
of educational technologies (hardware's and software's)
·
To
assess the extent in which the staffs are using technology (frequency and
quality of technology use).
·
To
guide the staffs to be techno friendly
References
Garrison, R.,
& Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework,
principles and guidelines. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Torrisi-Steele,
G. (2011). This Thing Called Blended Learning — A Deļ¬nition and
Planning Approach. In Krause, K., Buckridge, M., Grimmer, C.and Purbrick-Illek,
S.(Eds.) Research and
Development in Higher Education: Reshaping Higher Education, 34, 360 – 371.