Overview of Maldivian Higher Education
System
Maldives established its very first college
in 1998 under the name Maldivian College of Higher Education (MCHE) which later
changed to Maldives National University (MNU) in 2011, making it the first
University in the country. It was only after 2008, MCHE/MNU had its first
competitor -Villa College, the second higher education institution in the
country. Hence, the higher education system in Maldives is still in its infancy
and has a lot to learn from the developed countries.
For the purpose of this task, examples are
taken from these two institutions, namely Maldives National University (MNU)
and Villa College. Please visit the following site for further in formation.
Challenges in Governance, Management and
Practice in HE
Ø Competition in attracting and retaining quality staffs
v In Maldives the teaching profession is not valued enough, hence
there is a lack of human resource in this field. Main reason for this is due to
the small salary compared to other professions. In addition , due to other
mismanagement issues and poor governance, for example, lack of proper structure
and fairness in giving promotions , salary increment and appraisals, a lot of qualified
professionals are leaving this field for better opportunities overseas.
v To address this issue higher education system needs to develop
proper policies regarding salary structure and increments and make sure that an
equal emphasis is given to higher education sector. Emphasis should also be
given to provide professional development opportunities in this sector. Kim and
Loadman (1994) also mentioned that intrinsic (professional challenge,
professional autonomy, interaction with colleagues and students) and extrinsic
(working conditions, salary increment) rewards need to be offered to maintain
the quality staffs and to attract quality staffs.
Ø Quality assurance
v
The two main methods of quality assurance used in Maldives are evaluation
of teaching by students and lecturers' performance appraisal process. Often,
the results of both of these processes are unreliable mainly because most
students do not take it seriously and
fill such evaluation forms just for the sake of it, or they tend to
favour certain lecturers. Secondly, sometimes appraisals are highly subjective
and often based on only one lecture observation. Depending only on these two
methods are not enough because as Anderson (2006) describes, the authority
given to students in evaluating lecturers has the potential for damage. In
addition Anderson also states that "performance
appraisal process is a surveillance that could potentially be used against the lecturers".
v
Hence, better ways to assure quality need to be considered. For
example models like `production model’, which
depicts a direct relationship between inputs and outputs (Tam, 2011) can be used. In addition using the `value-added approach’- which measures the gain by students before and after
they receive higher education, and the `total quality
experience approach’- which aims to capture the entire learning
experience undergone by students during
their years in universities or colleges need to be practiced (Tam, 2011).
Ø Technology
v Mainly multimedia projectors are used during lectures. Although
there is access to multimedia resources most lectures do not use them properly
because of time constraints in preparing the secondary resources or due to lack
of up to date knowledge and confidence in using them properly. In addition Internet/
WiFi is slow or unavailable and unreliable.
v To address this problem professional development workshops need to
be held for existing lecturers to help them build their confidence in utilizing
latest technology in class. Learning management systems like blackboard/moodle
need to be established so that both students and lecturers become more used to
the latest technologies. This is important to prepare the students and staffs
to survive in the globalised world.
Ø Teaching pedagogies
v Both higher education institutions use face to face lecture method
using PowerPoint presentation and few discussions. A variety of methods need to
be used for delivery. For instance, blended
learning methods need to be introduced and practiced.
v This would give access to educational opportunities for a wider
population, for example students in rural and remote islands.
Ø Research
v Area of research has not been a focus of higher education in the
Maldives. There is no research journal in the country. Reasons could be due to
the lack of funding to conduct research, lack of qualified researchers and
because there are more important issues to address at the moment than research
area. However, due to the lack of a research focus students graduating from
these institutions lack knowledge of research methods and practice.
Conclusion
As Maldives higher education system is
still in its infant stage it has to cope with a lot of challenges in governing
the system. First, it should focus on ways to enhance the quality of the system
by attracting and retaining qualified lecturers. This can be done by providing
an attractive salary and other benefits.
Secondly, these higher education institutions need to make more use of
the latest technologies both in teaching and in the learning process. Pedagogical
instructions need to be enhanced by using a variety of methods using
multimedia, internet and learning management system to ensure that its
graduates are ready to enter the work place in the globalised world. Finally,
both institutions need to improve its focus on research area so that the staffs
as well as the students are equipped with the skills required to survive in
this technologically advanced era.
Reference
§ Kim I and Loadman, W.(1994).
Predicting Teacher Job Satisfaction. Retrieved March
12, 2014 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED383707.pdf
- Tam, M. (2001). Measuring quality in higher education. from http://www.tandfonline.com.wwwproxy0.library.unsw.edu.au/doi/abs/10.1080/13538320120045076
It is interesting seeing your information regarding your HE system in its early development. My organisation is currently applying for its HE status through TEQSA. Your comments about the lack of involvement in the process of evaluation, mirrors the situation for my organisation this last year. Though recently developing an evaluation framework, our approach is somewhat the "horse after the cart" method. We have developed numerous learning modules and training packages without a consistent framework in place to support any process of evaluation.
ReplyDeleteIT is educationally unsound to develop any program, tool, module without having a clear outcome /evaluation process in place. Thanks for your post
Hi Aisher - Thanks for sharing this. It must be exciting to be part of Maldives HE in its earliest stages. It must be challenging indeed, but it's also a fantastic opportunity to "start with the the right foot".
ReplyDeleteAnd I agree with Amanda - evaluation processes are never an easy task to establish. Since we are dealing with highly subjective elements - teachers, students, teaching and learning outcomes - no matter how deep we dig in, it only gets worst. ;-)
But I still believe that, apart from compliance matters, the outcomes from the engagement processes (discussions, analysis and ideas exchanged) always worth the effort.
Thanks Aisher. I agree that one priority would be to attract and retain quality lecturers through competitive salaries. I did some reading in intrinsic motivation, happiness and its direct bearing on salaries [one example is Csikszentmihaly on TED http://www.ted.com/talks/mihaly_csikszentmihalyi_on_flow].
ReplyDeleteIt seems the proposition that a high salary will guarantee good performance is inconclusive for the moment.
Thanks. Jason
I agree recruitment and retention of staff is essential for the standard of quality in education programs.
ReplyDelete